Value Investing Fund, INC 1st Annual Letter 2019-2020


Value Investment Fund, INC. annual  Letter[1]

Quito, Ecuador.

9/27/2020

 


To the friends and investors of Value Investing Fund, INC.:

In our first year, ending September 1st, 2020, the fund has generated 86.48% in profits.

 

 


 

Ney Torres,

Portfolio Manager

Value Investing Fund, INC.

 

 

Attachments

 

Here is more information that some may find important:

Attachment A - What you should know about the fund

Attachment B - Statistical detail of last year

Attachment C - Description of positions

Attachment D - Thoughts on various issues

Attachment E - Others


 

 

Attachment A

 


What you should know about the fund

 

In each annual letter, I will try to honestly assess the fund's performance, reiterate my core investment philosophy, and share my thoughts on various issues.

I share some of the fund's holdings this year and explain what I think behind each one. This way you can get a better idea of ​​where we invest and why I invest, how I invest, and why I am very confident about the prospects of the fund. However, there will be times where I do not mention some positions. When more people find these, mostly small, companies the price of the stock can move abruptly.  Nor do I mention the size of the position.

To entertain/educate friends, family, and investors, I have created a podcast and a blog which you can find at neytorres.com. I hope you like it.

 

Performance targets

 

My main objective is to obtain a compound annual return of 10% to 15%[2], measured in a horizon of one to three years.

It is worth mentioning two landmarks that describe the environment today:

 

1.      The average rate in US savings is 0.39% per year.[3]

2.      “The US Stock Market Based on Historical Evidence. It is positioned to deliver an average annualized return of -2.5%”.[4]

 

There will be good years and open bad years

“In due course, great long-term performing managers will fall to the bottom half of peer groups over multiple three- and five-year periods. In order to generate strong long-term results, investors must stay invested through the lulls. Moving to a passively managed strategy during difficult periods often does not work either and switching between the two based on trailing returns can be counterproductive. No matter what path an investor takes, patience continues to be a prerequisite for success” -https://www.dimeoschneider.com/media/The-Next-Chapter-in-the-Active-vs-Passive-Debate.pdf

 

“…you know I had spectacular returns, but I couldn’t raise any money. Because every time I would go out and talk to people, people basically said “what the hell are you talking about? I want a monthly, I want a two weekly; I want a weekly return. I want you to go up in a down market. That is what I want. I want to be the bank except that I want you to yield better… Is not how much money I lost, is how much money I ‘forgot’” - Greenwald Li Lu CBS 2006, reflecting on mistakes of omission because he missed big winners trying to please investors that were asking for this.

This fund focuses on long term absolute returns. In my opinion, it makes it less risky even if in the future it turns out to be more volatile.

 

Most of the results of any fund come from a few decisions [5]

Winners tend to keep winning, Google is successful in part because it has cheap capital, and it has cheap capital because it is successful, it attracts the best talent, etc.

In capitalism and life in general, wealth, power, fame accumulates only for a few. The same happens in investments.

One conclusion from that is that not all our ideas will work and at any given time our gains or losses will surely depend on a few positions, while most do not have much movement.

We will not be oblivious to dips of 30% to 50% at times. Nor any other fund either. It is the nature of the stock market.

“ Even those long-term shareholders who were rewarded with the greatest cumulative returns endured large price declines over shorter intervals. I study shareholder wealth creation for all publicly-listed U.S. common stocks during each of the seven decades since 1950. Focusing on the 100 most successful stock/decades in terms of shareholder wealth creation, I document even within the highly successful decade, shareholders experienced draw-downs that lasted an average of 10 months and involved an average loss of 32.5%. During the immediately preceding decade, draw-downs for these highly successful stocks lasted an average of 22 months and involved an average cumulative loss of 51.6%.” - https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3657604

“…I guess no one will be too surprised that even the big winners deliver something of a bumpy ride – what surprised me was the extent. Apple has delivered drawdowns over 70% three separate times!  Even if one today purchased a stock that will turn out to be the big winner over the next decade or two, most likely there would be periods where the value drops 50% or more. And, as the fourth report in the series shows, it is very hard to identify tomorrow's winners based on characteristics that are objectively observable today.”

https://www.riaintel.com/article/b1mxbk4sr5l483/essential-wisdom-from-americas-best-performing-stocks

 

What does the fund do?

 

We value public companies around the world to buy their shares, and when we are convinced that we have found something at a discount, we invest.

Business valuation methods can be classified into six groups:

 

MAIN VALUATION METHODS [6]

 


My beliefs about the fund and investing:

·        Price is what you pay, and Value is what you get. They are not the same. If you think about it, the market is a place where there is a discrepancy in valuation, but a price agreement.

·        The valuation depends on many factors, perspective, time and opportunity cost (discount rate), but in general, a company or any financial asset is worth the money it produces and will produce in the future (cash flow discounted to present value).

·        The market is extremely efficient, so it takes a different perspective than most to have an advantage. Ours is patience, everyone wants to get rich quick. Our variant perspective is to go against what human nature dictates. Contrarian investors.

·        “Successful investing is about managing risk, not avoiding it.” — Benjamin Graham

·        Risk is not volatility, we like volatility. Risk is the permanent loss of capital by not knowing what you are doing.

·        There is no single strategy or valuation method. Which one the fund uses depends a lot on recognizing the market we are in. However, most of the time, I hope we will invest in things that we are happy to have positions in for three to ten years.

·        The size of the position is a determining factor in both trading and long-term investments. The more conviction you have, the more we should focus.

·        If we lose money going through the vicissitudes of life, do not doubt that it is 100% my responsibility. And that most of my assets are in the fund, so is within my best interest to avoid this at all cost. The further we advance, the more zeros our errors will have.

·        In the stock market, I do not compete against others, rather than compete with myself and my belief system.

·        My motivation to run the fund is to be able to serve those who entrust their savings to me, including family and friends.


 

Attachment B

 


Statistical details of last year

 

  




 




 




Attachment C

Description of positions

 

Below, I show some of our positions and their investment thesis. I want to clarify that these are summaries. Generally, an investment thesis is anything but easy, but I can try to simplify them here.

 

Context regarding investments in gold and silver

 

The first time I started thinking about gold and silver as an investment was probably in 2006 when I read a book by Mike Maloney which became a best-selling book on how to invest in gold and silver worldwide to this day. As you can see, I have spent some time thinking about this. As a value investor, I have resisted investing in gold and silver for the simple fact that there is no clear way to value precious metals. How do you value something that produces nothing?

A more rudimentary way is to look at trends and compare the purchasing power of gold and silver with other things. We stop measuring one oz of gold against dollars and compare it to cows, barrels of oil, etc. However, I do not know any way to anticipate trends, when they start, when they end.

I had to think long and hard before investing part of the fund in metal-related stocks. By the way, we have an interview with Mike Maloney and mining experts on the Financially Free Podcast at FinanciallyFreePodcast.com. Mike came to Ecuador to an event that I organized with more than 700 people, and he did it without charging a single cent. Without a doubt one of the best people I know. If you want to understand more about gold and silver, do not hesitate to visit their page GoldSilver.com and please see all their videos on Youtube.com

What is the problem with investing in gold and silver?

Bottom line: That you can go decades without a satisfactory return.

However, what I can tell you is this:

 

"You don’t need to know a man’s weight to know that he’s fat” - Benjamín Graham

 


 

Note: This is a graph comparing dollar production versus gold and silver production. But this is just US dollar printing versus GLOBAL gold and silver production.

The premise for those who invest in gold, silver (and even Bitcoin) is simple; we have a limited quantity, and other people will want it in the future.

Investing in gold and silver is insurance against the eminent fall in the purchasing power of the dollar or world currencies. They are designed that way, an extended explanation in the next Attachment. The image you are seeing above is a comparison between the "production" of gold and silver versus the "production" of dollars. Every month 120 billion dollars are printed, and we only refine the equivalent of $13.6 billion in gold and $1.27 billion in silver. We can conclude that there will be more and more dollars fighting for a limited amount of gold and silver.

When we decide to exit our positions, depends fundamentally on the opportunity cost of some other investment available at that time.

Would you rather invest in a business that can grow 2, 10 or 100 times? Of course, we all know the answer to that. The economy is down globally and as businesses crash everywhere, we can sleep like babies knowing that our positions in these metals are probably farther from Covid-19 consequences than most businesses. The dollar is losing its value, unlike gold and silver. Many will think that this is true of anything that is measured against US dollars, and they are right. But gold and silver are what people historically run to when they are afraid.

Could the price of gold and silver drop with the Covid-19 vaccine? Yes, but only momentarily.

 


Source: https://goldprice.com/gold-silver-ratio/#:~:text=What%20is%20the%20Gold%2FSilver,buy%20one%20ounce%20of%20gold.

Here we can see a metric when we divide the price of gold and silver, we can see that the result is 81. For 1 oz of gold, you can buy 81 oz of silver. Historically this should reach 17.5. Which means one of two things, silver is going to go up a lot, or gold is going to fall.

Our analysis indicates that silver is going to go up a lot. We consume silver in electronic systems, cell phones, computers, etc.

People who invest in gold and silver generally point to the monetary history of mankind. There is a predictable pattern. Governments started with gold and silver as money, later they started creating paper notes, trust is lost when the economy is down. These notes turn to gold and silver once again. There has been fiat[7] currency many times in history, they never last for long.

What is the problem?

The problem is that this is exactly the argument that Warren Buffett's father made perhaps 80 years ago[8]. I think he was right. I think many will die being right, without seeing the price of gold skyrocket or an economic catastrophe of such magnitude that the dollar is destroyed or returns to the gold standard. But if Buffett had taken the $100,000 from his initial partnership in 1956, he could have bought 2,858 oz of gold. With an approximate current value of $5.5 million instead of his current net worth estimated at $80.5 billion, of which he has donated the majority to charities.

Gold is not a bad investment, particularly at the moment, but we are not investing only in metals. We are investing in special situations where we are going to make money if the price of gold is stable, rises or even falls a little.



 

GoldX Mining Corp (GLDX)

 

- Mines are the worst business in the world, so pay attention as this fall into the category of "special situation".

- Why are we seeing this opportunity? Because it is small, but I hope not for long.

- Investors tend to hate mining stocks. The value is not obvious unless you develop knowledge in a niche.

- They have approximately 10 million oz of gold, with a net present value of a billion US dollars.

- This is not an exploration mine, here the reserves are confirmed.

- "... Again, there is a level of risk you have to take here, but the real bank for your money is investing in a developer that hasn't gone into production yet because you will get a reassessment when it goes into production, and also they want to choose a developer who has the opportunity to increase their resource ounces. ”[9]- Frank Giustra (A billionaire who made his fortune in mining and leads this project)



Gran Colombia Gold Q1 2020 Results Webcast

In this graph, you can see that with an average revaluation GoldX will probably see a rise of 300% to 600% of its current stock price and this is if the price of gold doesn’t continue to rise. It may take a few years, but there is no rush we can wait. In fact, that is our only advantage, we are willing to have a long-term perspective.

 

Gran Colombia GOLD (GCM:TSX)

 

It is the largest gold producer in Colombia, with two operations. The guidance for 2020 is an expected production of 220,000 oz of gold and despite Covid-19, they have decreased their cost to less than $700/oz.

Capitalization is $432 million of which 50% in cash and produces $149 million a year. All this if the price of gold does not rise.

 

 

Freddie MAC (FMCC) and FANNIE MAE (FNMA)

 

These are two banks who were affected greatly by the 2008 recession. The simplification of the investment thesis is; that the banks have already paid all its debts to the government. Politicians do not want to return the banks to its shareholders, in effect nationalizing both which isn’t legal. Trump gave hints of ending this, which may have revalued his shares by 1000%. We lost 30% on these positions when we sold them. I believe the chance of the Democrats winning the 2020 election is present.  Therefore, there would not be so much political force willing to fight for the shareholders of Freddie and Fannie. Although they may surprise us any day.

 

Lumber Liquidators (LL)

 

Before the pandemic, we had a good percentage dedicated to LL that fluctuated around $10. We sold these positions at a small profit, as my impression of management began to deteriorate.

There were a couple of offers for the company around $10.

Covid-19 happened, and we bought at exactly $4. In a matter of weeks, it reached the previous price of $10. The reason for selling was that their official reports mentioned great online sales. When I tried to visit their website it was down for several days. I did not think twice about selling the stock. And what happened next? The price raised to over $28… Your humble servant did it again!

Many people argue that LL is going to fail, for various reasons, but it certainly has the potential to be a great company in a very fragmented and competitive market, as it once was. This company goes to the “too hard” drawer in the world of Covid-19.

 

Wells Fargo (WFC)

 

It has been called the most hated company on Wall Street, it has had several scandals in the last 5 years, but they are all manageable in my opinion. The best metric for a bank is its price compared to its tangible book value. Historically, WFC has traded at 1.4 times. In 2015 it traded at 2 times tangible book value, more than JPMorgan, Citigroup, and Bank of America.

Now it is trading at 0.6 times its tangible value. If you see the projected cash flow, the price today should be $85 per share, not $23. Wells Fargo has a lot of problems that they still need to solve such as pushing its sales team to the point where they were opening fraudulent accounts for their customers, very high operating expenses, low margins versus the competition and exposure to commercial loans. Do not forget the avalanche of mortgage defaults that are coming soon.

WFC has capitalized quite well for what is to come.

Banks make money from their deposits, and with all these problems not only have deposits remained, but they have grown. Today WFC has 1.4 trillion US dollars in deposits.

And while our investments in precious metals benefit from a low-interest-rate environment, the bank does not. When interest rates start to rise in years to come, banks will begin to expand.

 

Tankers

 

This industry is incredibly hated and for good reason, it has been a lousy business for a decade.

They are beginning to enter a cycle where their earnings can go up substantially, with some trading at 33% of their tangible book value. That is if they close doors today and sell everything, our return would be 300%. I think that the tanker sector, hated today and at a price that reflects it, is going to give us good surprises in the next 2 years.

 

Others

 

Other stocks are not of significance now and have been ‘frozen’ with no profit or loss. The closed ones are; 869 Playmates toys limited, TLFA, PSH, LFE and LPG. In general, we closed these positions to focus on others with greater profit potential, considering new information. In none of them, we made  or lost substantial amounts.

 

Vertu Motors PLC (VTU)

 

Vertu Motors PLC is a car retailer in the UK. A business with stable margins. About 75% of the company's profits come from recurring service revenue and used car sales combined.

It allows us to have exposure to the British pound (GBP). It has more than 100 concessionaires and owns half of the properties.

With a return of 11.73% on tangible equity in the last decade, buying those £44 of tangible book value per share at just £26 is a 40% discount. Our long-term return would go from 11.73% to 16.42% annually.

In the long term, we expect to see a return on investment of 16.42% annualized for having these shares, and they can double in the not so distant future.

There is a stock that is responsible for 27.4% of this year's earnings and that I expect to go up 500% more. However, it is so small that the price can move easily, so we will keep it hidden until we sell it.

 

 

ProShares Ultra Pro S&P 500 ETF (UPRO) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3x Shares ETF (SPXL)

 

We took positions in these funds when the market fell. A lot of this year's returns come from these two funds, and options we invested in.

More about these two positions in the Financially Free Podcast, episode 31:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TZHlCyAuvw

or

https://financiallyfreepodcast.libsyn.com/31-50-a-year-guarantee-buffett-challenge-with-ney-torres

Initially, the positions in UPRO and SPXL grew to represent more than 40% of the portfolio. They were positions we took when the market crashed and the central bank declared that it was going to enter the markets (manipulate them). Even if they had to buy the stocks and bonds themselves.

I hypothesised that they were going to do their best to reach levels from before the US elections and that is exactly what happened. About 25% of the return this year was thanks to these positions.

While the implied volatility of the options of these two funds stabilized (this means that they were very expensive before) we changed our positions to two-year options (also called “leaps”) this way we lowered our exposure to only 10% of the fund. These options were up 180%, representing about another 14% of our return of 84% this year.

 

We sold these “Leaps” because I believe the markets are expensive right now and it can take a long time to get your money back if you happen to invest on the top of a cycle. Here is the Nasdaq, it took about 14 years to recover. This is not market timing we just simply have better ideas.



Source: https://www.macrotrends.net/1320/nasdaq-historical-chart

Source: https://www.macrotrends.net/2324/sp-500-historical-chart-data



How do we know if the market is overvalued?

I do not know. But let me repeat:

"You don’t need to know a man’s weight to know that he’s fat” - Benjamín Graham

The metric that I like to use to evaluate the market, in general, is price/sales. The Economist John Hussman has shown that this metric is the one with the highest negative correlation with respect to the returns of the market for the next 10 years.

That simply means that when price/sales are high, the returns for the next 10 years are low, and vice versa.



A similar metric to the one stated above replaces "price" with "market capitalization" and "sales" with "GDP" how much a country produces in a year.

This “Market Cap / GDP” metric is also known as the “Buffett indicator” because Warren Buffett mentioned that it is the best rule of thumb to assess whether a market is overvalued or not.





“As of 2020-09-26 03:05:05 PM CDT (daily updates):

The stock market is significantly overvalued. Based on the historical ratio of total market capitalization to GDP (currently 173.5%), it is likely that you will get a return of -2.5% per year from this valuation level, including dividends.” - https://www.gurufocus.com/stock-market-valuations.php

"2021 to detonate an avalanche of business insolvency"

The year 2021 is coming and it is going to be anything but boring.

 


 

Attachment D

 

Thoughts on various matters

 

This section is written to explain some important concepts.

Every year I hope to write and explain a different topic.

I saw this headline a week before writing this report:

“$92,033 - The average salary for a Harvard University graduate 10 years after graduation. Harvard ranked at the top of the Wall Street Journal's annual list of college rankings.” - Wall Street Journal

Congratulations! You just graduated from Harvard, it is a big 4-year endeavor and costs between $47,000 to $78,000 annually[10]. You are certainly a lucky person, there are only 371,000[11] graduate students from the best university in the world. On a planet of almost 8 billion people[12], where 50% is estimated to live on less than $5.50 a day (in 2018) and 10% lives on less than $1.90 a day[13].

Now you work 5 days a week from 9 am to 5 pm, and probably more, to earn $92,033 annually. After taxes you take home $56,267.76, assuming you do not pay any state or city taxes. If your partner earned the same, you both would be among the top 5 to 10% of the highest income in the USA, the richest country in the world. If your job is in California or New York, for example, you would have to pay more than 50% in taxes. In theory, all the money you earned from January to June went directly to the government. Did I mention that your rent is more than $3000 for a normal apartment? ... But in this example let us forget about all this. I am going to let Harvard graduates take the lead, forget about the high rents and state or city taxes. Let us imagine that they live with the same salary in another country, doing remote work on the beach perhaps?

Now, what would have happened if that student had invested the average annual cost of attending Harvard ($62,500) and had invested it at 17.41% annually? You guessed it! A $56,267.76 yield in the fifth year, as seen in the table below. The same amount as you would have taken home in the form of a check, and with fewer taxes because earned income is taxed quite different than investment income.



So by investing, after four years you would make the equivalent of an average Harvard graduate with a full-time job who also paid a fortune on tuition and spend four years of their life at the best university in the world (assuming you don't pay state and other taxes that are automatically deducted from your salary).

But unlike the university graduate, the investor doubles his capital every 4 years.

This is not a criticism towards Harvard students a quality education fulfils many more goals in life than simply making more money. But this is the financial reality that I was faced to see a couple of years ago when I was applying to Stanford in California (I'm not saying they would have accepted me by the way).

I do this simple exercise to highlight the power of compound interest and the advantages of independent thinking. That is what this fund is trying to do for its investors and me.

It has taken me 15 years to start this small fund and 15 years to understand how to compete against Wall Street and the secret is... patience.

Why 15 years? Because I was trying to create enough capital to start, but life goes up and down, turns and gives you surprises. Now I understand that I should have just started 15 years ago and focused even with $10,000.The problem is that we are always in negotiation with ourselves, waiting for something important to happen; "if I only sell this property", "if I get this credit", "if they accept this offer", "after the next raise", "if I liquidate inventory ”… then I can be calm and invest. Next thing you know,15 years have passed. This is the catch; investing is more like a dropper than the allocation of big chunks of capital. If in those 15 years anyone that had saved $ 326.15 per month and invested at the same rate as our imaginary Harvard student, they could have achieved the same result.

 

 


If for a moment you thought this exercise did not apply to you because you did not have rich parents to pay for Harvard, you do not have an excuse either. You just had to start investing small amounts earlier.

Plus “Harvard University” is a metaphor that represents any financial goal you have like retirement or legacy.

I want to use these annual letters to explain what has taken me so long to learn. Hopefully, I can make it easy and entertaining. If you can sit down and read the following pages you will understand the world and the future a little better. Enjoy!

Ok, let’s make money investing! For that we first need to understand:

 

How does the economy work? (An easy explanation)

 

Every time you buy or sell something, you have just made a transaction "the economy", "the market", is the sum of all these transactions.

Each transaction is the exchange of money or credit for goods, services or financial assets.

If we add all the credit that we use plus the money that is spent, we have the total expense.

Money + credit = Total Expense (the sum of goods, services, or financial assets)

So far nothing difficult to understand. Right?

Total spending is what drives the economy (at least in economic theory):

Total expenditure / total quantity (of goods, services, financial assets) = Price

or

Total Expense / Things we want = Price

That is a transaction, so far, I have not described anything new, only described what seems obvious.

But! If you can understand how transactions work, you can understand the economy and where it is going (you can see the future!)

 

What is a “market”?[14]

A series of transactions of some kind.

Example: car transactions. We call this the “Car Market”. Transactions in sugar, the “Sugar Market”. Etc.

Today we will focus on the Stock Market.

 

Who is the biggest buyer and seller in a market?

The Government! In the US[15] and many other countries this government consists of two main parts:

1.      The “Central Government” who is responsible for spending the money and

2.      The “Central Bank” that controls the flow of money, important to control the economy and does it in two ways:

            1) raise and lower interest rates

            2) print money

 

The least understood part of the economy is CREDIT

Do you want something you cannot afford? A good, a service or a financial asset? To start a business or buy a house you need credit!

If credit is cheap, more people get into debt.

Whoever lends has just created an asset and receives interest, and whoever receives the money now has a debt and pays that interest.

Note: Credit can be created by two ordinary people out of thin air! As you surely understand, everything depends on trust, when trust between humans disappears, the system begins to break down.

When debt is spent it becomes someone else's income, and this, ladies and gentlemen, is what drives the economy.

It is much easier to go into debt for 100,000, 1 million, 2 million, 100 million dollars than to earn it by selling something. That is why it is so important to understand credit!

What do you need to access credits?

1) Being able to pay it

2) A guarantee

Why does the market go up and down so abruptly?

The higher your income, the greater your ability to pay a debt. The more debt, the more spending, the more income for someone else, this effect is multiplied through society and the economy begins to produce more things, more goods, more services and more financial assets.

We call this productivity, and it is easy to predict in the long term.

Productivity:

 


Source: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Real-US-GDP-per-capita-1870-2006_fig1_46457345

When investing we try to forget about the short-term fluctuations, as much as possible and focus on what is predictable and knowledgeable. You guessed it! Productivity.

What is this “productivity”?

 

Productivity is that we get better at creating things with time (the knowledge and things that help us to produce these goods and services is also called technology).

Technology helps us make life more pleasant and bearable. Now you have more things to improve your standard of living than 200 years ago. Only 20 years ago the best way to communicate with my parents from another continent was a “long distant call” (expensive) or letter (slow). Today I can have video conversations through a cellphone with anyone on the planet basically for free.

We can access the brightest minds and ideas on the planet from any cellphone or computer. (Now ...if most people prefer to be distracted by watching Netflix instead of improving their productivity, there is not much you and I can do about it, I guess our job gets easier for lack of competition).

Those who work hard and improve their productivity every day increase their standard of living faster than those who indulge easily.

When someone becomes innovative, they can create something better or cheaper. This creates inequality. If you ever think that life is unfair, I hope you know that it is true, but that the best way out of it is to innovate. That is the time that you want to create something new or different that others appreciate.

But not everything is as obvious as trying harder, doing more and doing better! Long-term productivity is easy to determine, but there is a trap that allows people and governments to steal from the future to feel rich today and produce more… momentarily: DEBT!

Why debt is stealing yourself from the future?

 


Because debt is a promise to take my productivity (from the future) to pay interest ... in the future.

What creates abrupt rises and falls in any market is debt and this exists in two large cycles, one of 5 to 8 years, and another of 75 to 100 years.

 

Below you will find a graph of gross domestic product growth (all the things a country produces in a year) versus time. It is a very rudimentary way of measuring the average standard of living of human beings. Assuming that the more variety of things we create or produce, the better the standard of living[16]. Do you have a rare disease? The more specialized and productive society is, the greater the possibility that you can get cured, and the cheaper it is.

 


Source: https://getmoneyrich.com/economy-and-short-term-debt-cycles/

 

 

 

Now that you understand this:

        You know that every decade, the world “breaks” for some reason at least once every seven to ten years because of the “short debt cycle”.

        When there are problems, everything that was built in decades falls out the window in a period of two to three years into a "Depression", but productivity continues its slow path, which leads us to have a better standard of living in the future (that's why I'm optimistic but only in the long term).

        In those couple of years (depression) it is the best time to buy at a discount, this includes financial assets. It is precisely when there is greater uncertainty that you must invest. When most people say, "let's wait to see what happens" (example political elections). Uncertainty is and will always be our ally.

        The general problem is having cash or credit at the moment when everything is at a discount. When you have done your previous work well and have this cash or credit the decisions are obvious.

        This cycle is predictable

        What you must do throughout your life is specialize, be more productive in something that others want or need despite short term fluctuations.

        Stop watching so much Netflix / TV!

Credit versus Money

Credit is about 15 times bigger than cash (in US dollars).

Money is the only thing that consolidates or pays a debt.

Therefore, the system is made to constantly generate more debt (due to interest). If we tried to pay all debt the system would "break", it would stop working. The name of the game, therefore, is "good debt".

Debt is good if it is invested efficiently.

Debt is bad if it is spent or inefficiently placed on non-productive things. The wealth you have saved in the past (savings) or “stolen” from the future (debt) is destroyed.

Placing money efficiently is what an investor does! That is what I do and what I specialized in for 15 years! It is what makes me productive in this society

Note: The best two hours invested in your financial life is probably watching the series created by Mike Maloney on his YouTube channel called "Hidden Secrets of Money”. Here Mike takes an extremely complicated topic like the history of money and shows how it works in easy to understand videos with animations. Like a short documentary.



Why do you have to work?

The question seems silly. The answer? Because you have expenses!

Next question: What is the biggest expense in your life?

This answer is not so easy because it varies depending on your level of productivity.

Some may think “food $ ____, mortgage / rent $ ___, insurance $ _____etc.”

But the more productive you are, the clearer the tax issue becomes.

Imagine you made $1 million this year. The median tax rate for taxpayers making more than $1,000,000 is 33.1%... That is $331,000

Let's exaggerate, imagine you made $10 Million this year. There is no way you can spend 33.1%[17] of that on food, education, etc.

But there is a tax that you are paying right now, in the same proportion as the millionaires and the poor. It is an invisible tax… and there is nothing you can do to avoid it except invest. This ‘invisible tax’ is called inflation!

Inflation

 


What this chart shows is that, depending on how you measure it, you lose between 4% to 6%[18] value on your money annually. You can buy 4-6% less with the same amount of money. How much did your bank pay you this year? Ha!

If 4% per year does not scare you, it is because you have not thought about the long-term compounding effect that this has on your savings and your income:

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Year 6

Year 7

Year 8

Year 9

Year 10

$10.000

$9.600

$9.216

$8.847

$8.493

$8.153

$7.827

$7.514

$7.213

$6.925

 

An inflation of 4% is like having a compound annual expense of 4%. This includes your salary, rent, savings etc.

I am not going to make a graph with 6% real inflation, so you don’t stress out.

Inflation forces you to work and invest. If you don’t your savings will be worth even less and less and your income too! That is why every time you must work harder, be more productive or be innovative.

Inflation passes wealth from your pocket to the central government, magically.

In our system, the politician the most popular politicians win elections. To be popular they usually promise more things. The government makes more promises and prints more money to pay for all these promises. The value of the money that politicians use comes at a cost, collection of taxes and the devaluation of your savings. Every time there is a war, you pay, every time the market crashes and the government jump’s in to save the companies that are “too big to fail”, you pay! You just do not realize it immediately. Unfair? Completely. But the question is: what are you going to do?

In 1960 the average salary in the USA was enough for a person with a normal job to have a house, a car and be able to support his partner and children without any problem. Today two middle-class jobs hardly allow you to survive. Sadly, if you do not invest, you will not get ahead, plain and simple.

Deflation

Deflation is the opposite of inflation. The price of things begin to fall, therefore, your money can buy you more!

Economists avoid deflation in all possible ways, because when the price of things fall: There are no longer profits, there are layoffs, companies begin to fail, and the system begins to fall under its weight. Eventually, there are mass demonstrations and the most radical candidate who promises to solve everything is generally elected, for example, Hitler!

The objective of a central bank is generally to have low inflation. This is easier said than done.

When there is a lot of debt the government tries to stop inflation by raising interest rates. For them, it is like applying a brake. By the way, the brake is quite effective.

When they want the economy to accelerate, they lower interest rates (this is like pressing the gas), so that people get into debt and there are more transactions, and the economy is activated.

The market is very intelligent, so economists know that if they want to have a noticeable impact, they must surprise the public. That is why generally when interest rates rise it is done suddenly, but they can’t alert anyone if the markets expect a rise in these rates, prices are quickly rectified. Many times, government authorities bluff to obtain their objectives, sometimes that is all it takes, they do not even have to raise or lower rates, only to suggest that they could do it can move the market.

Market participants, millions of people, adapt and anticipate any stimulus.

Therefore, the monetary policy game is so difficult and not just a mathematical formula. I do not know anyone who can predict interest rates to consistently make money.

"We've long felt that the only value of stock forecasters is to make fortune tellers look good.". -  Warren Buffett

Politicians, they don't know what they are doing!

 

Ha! I always hear this. Those who say it do not understand that even the politician’s hands are tied, they are part of a much larger, predictable machine.

If you understand this, you will be able to see the future much better than the average person, so pay attention!

When an economy gets into trouble there are only 4 things you can do:

1.      Cut expenses (business and government)

2.      Reduce debt (forgive or restructure)

3.      Redistribute wealth from the rich to the poor (do you want more taxes?)

4.      Print money (Countries like Ecuador do not have this option because at some point in their history they did it so much that their currency was destroyed and started using the US dollar)

Cutting expenses, reducing debt and redistributing wealth through taxes create more depression.

Whereas printing money is easy and creates inflation (and a false sense of progress at first).

If governments can balance their inflationary efforts with deflationary ones, that is, if all their efforts to activate the economy equal all the force that is destroying the economy, a recession is quite bearable. Since inflation would not be a problem, there is real economic growth and debts decrease with respect to income, all good, even though we are on the decline. But wealth will pass from one part of the population to another. Which side are you on?

 

A final note, given the business closures and the difficulties we are going through.

Without a doubt, as an entrepreneur I understand very well what it feels like to go bankrupt. To close a business, lay-off staff and have debts. It has happened to me a couple of times in my life. Capitalism and life can be brutal. When you read that a company goes bankrupt, remember what it means is that the company now has new owners. What technology, pandemics and recessions do is to reorganize us as humans into new perspectives, new projects, new professions.

“History doesn’t often repeat itself, but it often rhymes” - Mark Twain

Last century humanity went through 10 pandemics[19], the worst was in 1918 with the Spanish flu that killed 3-5% of the world's population. Humanity went through many wars of which two world wars[20]. In 13 occasions there was almost a nuclear attack and yet the world production went from $3.42 trillion in 1900 to $60 trillion in 1999. In one lifetime humanity prospered 20 times more despite all these difficulties.

Although "life does not wait for anyone", you shouldn’t doubt that the best is yet to come. "Waiting for things to settle down" (whatever that means) is an awfully bad idea. The future is always uncertain. The most recent events tend to occupy more relevance in our mind and it always seems that “now is different”.

In the stock market, you must invest especially when there is uncertainty because when there is no uncertainty there is optimism. That optimism drives up the stock price, and the more you pay for a stock, the lower your return.

 “Buy when there's blood in the streets, even if the blood is your own.” - Baron Rothschild[21]

This last sentence shows that when investing, IQ doesn’t matter as much as the temperament and character.

“Investing is not a game where the guy with the 160 IQ beats the guy with the 130 IQ. Once you have ordinary intelligence, what you need is the temperament to control the urges that get other people into trouble in investing.”. – Warren Buffet[22]

 

Covid-19

 

I think we all know people who are no longer with us because of Covid-19, if you are reading this, you are among the lucky ones. I want to end this year with condolences to those who have lost a loved one in this pandemic.


 

Attachment E

 


Other notes

 

FinanciallyFreePodcast.com

 

Episode 31) 50% a year guarantee Buffett challenge with Ney Torres

From the famous quote:

“If I was running $1 million today, or $10 million for that matter, I’d be fully invested. Anyone who says that size does not hurt investment performance is selling. The highest rates of return I’ve ever achieved were in the 1950s. I killed the Dow. You ought to see the numbers. But I was investing peanuts then. It’s a huge structural advantage not to have a lot of money. I think I could make you 50% a year on $1 million. No, I know I could. I guarantee that.”Warren Buffett

A year ago, I got interviewed and I said that we could do this. We opened a real money account and 9 months later we reached our goal. In this episode, Veerle van den Berg interviews me on how it was done.

 

Episode 21) Mary Buffett: Value investing and stories about Warren Buffett.

In this episode we talk with the charming Mary Buffett on her stories on value investing, and how she found out that her father-in-law was becoming the best investor in history. She is so kind, really an outstanding person.

 


 

Episode 10) The Best Trading Coach in the World - Van Tharp

An interview with who I consider the best trading coach in the world because he has focused more than anyone on psychology in trading for decades. An incredible career, one of the best minds on trading in the world.

 


 

Episode 29) Brad Sugars on Financial freedom, buying businesses without your own money

Don’t miss our talk with business coach Brad Sugars. He is the pioneer in the business coaching industry, he created the first successful business coaching company “Action Coach” with over 1000 offices around the world.

 


Chuck Norris wishes Ney Torres a happy 37th birthday! (Special episode October 11th,2020)

 


 

 

Special thanks to:

Doctor Veerle Van den Berg, for helping me edit the English report for hours and hours, obviously my native language is Spanish. She has a sharp mind, never stops to amaze me how smart she is.

 

 

 

 

Legal information and disclosures

This letter does not constitute, and should not be construed as, an offer of advisory services, securities or other financial instruments, a solicitation of an offer to buy any security or other financial instrument, or a recommendation to buy, hold or sell a security or other financial instruments in any jurisdiction.

The provision of information in this letter does not constitute the provision of investment, consulting, legal, accounting, tax or other advice.

The information presented in this letter reflects the current views of the author as of the date of the letter. As facts and circumstances change, the views of the author may also change. This letter may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions, and other factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from the future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements. Also, new risks and uncertainties may arise from time to time. Accordingly, all forward-looking statements should be evaluated with their inherent uncertainty in mind. The Fund does not undertake any obligation to update this letter.

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS, WHICH MAY VARY.

Certain information contained in this letter, such as market and economic information, is obtained from third party sources and may not be updated until the date of the letter. While such Sources are believed to be reliable, the Fund assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of such information.



[1] Value Investing Fund, INC is a corporation incorporated under the laws of Florida, on September 1, 2019. I do the closing date, but I hope to publish the report until October 11 of each year.

[2] It may not look like much but a 15% compounded interest rate would growth your capital 400% in 10 years

[4] Gurufocus - https://www.gurufocus.com/stock-market-valuations.phpLos mercados no prometen ganancias pronto. Con base en la relación histórica de capitalización de mercado total sobre el PIB (actualmente en 173,5%), es probable que obtenga un rendimiento de -2,5% anual incluidos los dividendos” Gurufocus - https://www.gurufocus.com/stock-market-valuations.php

[5] https://www.jpmorgan.com/cm/BlobServer/Eye_on_the_Market_September_2014_-_Executive_Summary.pdf?blobkey=id&blobwhere=1320684901654&blobheader=application/pdf&blobheadername1=Cache-Control&blobheadervalue1=private&blobcol=urldata&blobtable=MungoBlobs

[6] https://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=440117105065027124110114085116122122061052048060033049127111011125116107064019025074050061056028053034110065023010064127027124098041043075040104065104073095066009034071111004002078095031125119020118011126025126086007026000007115071126021093018094&EXT=pdf

[7] Fiat money is government-issued currency that is not backed by a physical commodity, such as gold or silver, but rather by the government that issued it. - investopidia

[8] The Snowball: Warren Buffett and the Business of Life Book by Alice Schroeder

[9] Get Gold as Cash and Bonds Will Be Destroyed Warns Billionaire Frank Giustra - Stansberry Research

[10] https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/05/it-costs-78200-to-go-to-harvardheres-what-students-actually-pay.html

[12] https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/

[13] Lakner, Mahler, Negre, Prydz, 2020. PovcalNet, Global Economic Prospects via World Bank

 

[15] Nota: I generally describe the US market, because that is where we invest most of the fund, but this letter is addressed to people in North America, Latin America, Europe. The markets work similarly in capitalist countries

 

[16] Note: Many people will argue that measuring gross domestic product is a wrong way to measure humanity's progress since material things do not represent well-being, and it is true. But assuming that the goal of the person's well-being is peace or happiness, the only objective way to measure well-being is through measuring the number and type of synapses in your brain, which is impossible now. Until then this is the best we have, and we use this graph. If you did not understand this note read "Homo Deus by Yuval Noah Harari"

 

[17] https://taxfoundation.org/how-much-do-people-pay-taxes/

[18] politicians always try to change this to look good, they use the red line, I use the blue line for reference

[20] https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/timeline-of-20th-and-21st-century-wars

[21] https://www.investopedia.com/articles/financial-theory/08/contrarian-investing.asp#:~:text=Baron%20Rothschild%2C%20an%2018th%2Dcentury,streets.%22%20He%20should%20know.&text=The%20original%20quote%20is%20believed,the%20blood%20is%20your%20own.%22

[22] https://fs.blog/2011/10/warren-buffett-on-temperament/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CInvesting%20is%20not%20a%20game,people%20into%20trouble%20in%20investing.%E2%80%9D



Please read the article "Blog's "read me first"" Terms And Conditions Of Use All content provided on this blog is for informational purposes only. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner of this blog will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. This terms and conditions is subject to change at anytime with or without notice.

Popular posts from this blog

VOXTUR – 500% growth in 2022/2023.

Understanding Micron Technology Inc (NAS:MU)

A Different view on Fannie Mae (FNMA) and Freddie Mac (FMCC) "Optionality has value"!